Skip to content

To Be or Not to Be… a Descendant of William Shakespeare

One recent evening, I was browsing my online family tree at I had just days earlier confirmed a connection that led me to being able to identify a tenth-great-grandfather on my mother’s side: John Hill, born in 1572, in Sommerset County, England. Having identified John Hill, my next mission was to see what other records might exist that could perhaps lead me to even older ancestors.

Anyone who is familiar with can easily imagine what I did next… On my profile for John Hill, I clicked the folder tab titled “Hints”. (A “Hint” is a term Ancestry uses to refer to a promising lead that might help one identify additional family connections. Ancestry scans their databases for such leads and then passes them on as links to historical records or information submitted by other genealogists.)

Amongst the several hints that appeared for my John Hill, were some links to the family trees of other genealogists who also claimed to be descendants of John Hill. (Such leads can prove valuable, as someone else may have already discovered meaningful information about a common ancestor that you could, in turn, incorporate into your own family tree.)

As I scanned through several of these other genealogists’ family trees, I noticed something that most of their files had in common: they showed John Hill as being married to Susanna Shakespeare. Exploring this further, I clicked one link, and then another, and then I gasped in disbelief…

This Susanna Shakespeare was noted to have been the daughter of a William Shakespeare. “Nooo,” I thought to my self, could this be THE William Shakespeare??” Sure enough, he was: William Shakespeare, the famous English poet and playwright, born 449 years ago, in 1564! And if what I was seeing was correct, that would make William Shakespeare MY eleventh-great-grandfather!

“Wait until I tell my family!” I thought to myself (in proper Shakespearean English, no less).


Armed with this new information, I did what any eager family historian would do… I searched for as many historical texts as I could find that might describe the personal life and the family of my new-found ancestor, William Shakespeare (information that would both validate this new discovery and, perhaps, lead to yet more family tree connections).

As I did so, one contradictory fact emerged that was nagging at my inner historian self. In my prior research, I had understood John Hill to have been a farmer; but all of the historical texts I was reading about William Shakespeare referred to his son-in-law, John Hill, as having been a prominent physician. Determined to resolve this discrepancy, I dug further and was surprised to find my ancestor’s life painted in a very different way than I had previously known.

My inner historian self still troubled, I returned to my prior research. Laying the conflicting information side by side, it was immediately apparent what I had done. My tenth-great-grandfather, John Hill, was indeed a farmer, a simple man and a Puritan. John HALL, on the other hand, was a prominent English physician. And yes, it was John HALL, not my ancestor, who married William Shakespeare’s daughter.

Frustrated and angry, I slammed the palms of my hands down on my desk. Mind you, I was not angry at learning that I was not descended from William Shakespeare. Rather, I was angry at myself for having made such a simple mistake. With all my experience, how could I have let myself get drawn down this erroneous path?! Of course, it then occurred to me that I was not alone in my error. After all, numerous other genealogists commingled the identities of John Hill and John Hall and included the Shakespeares in their online family trees. (More than half of those researching John Hill on had done so!)

An Analysis of the Problem

Personally, I am a big fan of Ancestry’s “hint” system. Through their hints, I have found some remarkable information that I might otherwise never have known about. That said, I nonetheless caution people to look very closely at every hint before accepting it as fact and incorporating it into one’s own family tree. (On average, I estimate that I have rejected about 75% of such hints as being inaccurate or not applying to my family.)

One shortcoming of Ancestry’s hints is that they will include records for individuals with similar names. Interestingly, this is also a strength of their hint system. (Every genealogist has encountered documents with misspelled names. For that matter, people, and sometimes entire families, have themselves changed the spelling of their names over the years. So it helps to be openminded to name variations.) My mistake, in this case, was that I scanned over the hints so quickly that I didn’t even notice the difference in spelling.

More than simply missing a different spelling of my ancestor’s last name, however, I also neglected to thoughtfully analyze other conflicting information. Had I done so, I would have noticed more quickly the different professions of the similarly named men. And I would have realized that the timeframe of the supposed marriage to Susanna Shakespeare was not logical, given the dates of birth of John Hill’s known children. Instead, I seized on the excitement of thinking that I might be related to William Shakespeare; and, albeit it only temporarily, I accepted the findings of other genealogists without first reviewing their sources with a critical eye.


I think it was Abraham Lincoln who once said, “You can’t believe everything you read on the internet.” (He was so ahead of his time!) This is especially the case with genealogy.

Mind you, I am not suggesting that internet-based research be avoided. Quite the contrary, I am a big fan of the internet! It has facilitated the sharing of information like mankind has never known before; and this sharing of information has led many a genealogist to discover meaningful legacies! (As a personal example… While I might have been disappointed to learn that I am not a descendant of William Shakespeare, through the internet I was able to discover — and verify — a connection with another tenth-great-grandfather, George Calvert, First Lord Baron Baltimore.)

Nonetheless, genealogists have a responsibility to themselves, and to the genealogy community overall, to include citations on all information they publish online. And genealogists, likewise, need to be diligent in reviewing and verifying the sources cited by others, lest they make the mistake that I did and accept as fact something that is far from it.

As William Shakespeare himself said, “Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.”

Suggested format for citations of this article:
Tormey, Michael. “To Be or Not to Be… a Descendant of William Shakespeare”, “Michael Tormey’s ‘Legacy Blog'”, posted May 3, 2013, ( accessed [access date]).


17 Comments Post a comment
  1. Oh, I so sympathize. Have gone down some erroneous roads myself. But you were able to correct your records promptly instead of climbing that tree ever higher and then having to re-do long after (uh, yeah, I’ve spent some time deconstructing a tree). In the long run, I always think that those are good experiences and teach me about other places or someone else’s famous relatives. I enjoy your blog and anticipate learning much more from you.

    May 3, 2013
    • Your point about such situations being a good opportunity to lern about someone else’s famous relatives was spot on. I love reading historical novels and biographies. And I must admit that I enjoyed my brief journey into the Shakespeare family. (I learned some things about them that I otherwise never would have known.)

      May 3, 2013
  2. History of Capitalism #

    Ach! So close and yet so far! Just imagine being a descendant of the Bard!

    May 3, 2013
    • So true! Of course, I did get some satisfaction at knowing that my ancestors lived in the same town and were his contemporaries.

      May 4, 2013
  3. Thanks for sharing that cautionary tale. Was is a ‘Comedy of Errors’ or ‘Much Ado about Nothing’? [Sorry. I could not resist.]

    May 4, 2013
  4. yship #

    Welcome to Geneabloggers!

    Regards, Grant

    May 4, 2013
    • Thanks, Grant! Glad to be aboard! Thanks for stopping by!


      May 4, 2013
  5. Well put. I take those hints as I would any “free” advice: with a sizable grain of salt. Despite the frustration, though, it sounded like an interesting diversion.

    I enjoyed finding your blog today, thanks to a mention in GeneaBloggers. Best wishes as you continue your blogging project!

    May 4, 2013
    • Thank you, Jacqi! And yes, I will admit, it was an interesting diversion and a good opportunity to learn some things about Shakespeare’s life that I never knew.

      May 4, 2013
  6. Brittney #

    I just did the same exact thing! I was trying to find the genealogy of my grandmother Audrey Guinn Hill. I got to John Hill and it said married to Susanna Shakespeare, and I started freaking out. So then I started researching and found that Susanna was married to a John Hall, and got really confused, then I found your article. I guess a lot of people are, because I found a lot about a John Hill, and even other people with the last name of Hill, in connection to Susanna and William Shakespeare.

    May 6, 2014
    • Kim #

      Susanna was Williams sister

      July 28, 2014
  7. I also sympathise. I have just started my family tree and the thouht of being related to Shakespeare set me to dreaming, which led me here!

    June 17, 2014
  8. Kim #

    You probably know this by now but William Shakespeare has no descendants. His sister does. His line died out with his children.

    July 28, 2014
  9. Stacey #

    I read another article that said there are no living direct descendants of William Shakespeare. The only relations to him are through children of his sister. So nieces and nephews.

    June 27, 2015
  10. Michael, Would you be interested in featuring this post or an abbreviated version on the Ancestry blog? If so, we’d love to share your lessons learned with the community.

    Please email social @, look forward to hearing from you!


    April 27, 2016

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. To Be or Not to Be… a Descendant of William Shakespeare

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: